Skeletal impact of parathyroidectomy on patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Parathyroidectomy is recommended for curing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), although uncertainty remains regarding the extent of fracture risk reduction following surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) changes in patients with PHPT undergoing parathyroidectomy (PTX) versus observation (OBS). DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until September 2022, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, and reviewed citations from previous reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Among 1,260 initial records, 48 eligible articles from 35 studies (5 RCTs; 30 cohorts) included PHPT patients receiving PTX or OBS interventions with reported fracture events at any site, including the hip, spine, or forearm, and/or BMD changes at each location. DATA EXTRACTION: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines by two independent reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 238,188 PHPT patients (PTX: 73,778 vs. OBS: 164,410), parathyroidectomy significantly reduced fractures at any site (RR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.74-0.86) compared to observation. In 237,217 patients (PTX: 73,458 vs. OBS: 163,759), the risk of hip fractures decreased (RR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.52-0.76). No reduction in forearm and vertebral fractures was observed in 3,574 and 3,795 patients, respectively. The annual percentage BMD changes from baseline were higher in the PTX group: femoral neck, 1.91% (95%CI, 1.14-2.68); hip, 1.75% (95%CI, 0.58-2.92); radius, 1.75% (95%CI, 0.31-3.18); spine, 2.13% (95%CI, 1.16-3.10). CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy significantly reduced overall and hip fracture risks in PHPT patients. Despite minimal BMD increase, the substantial decrease in fracture risk suggests additional benefits of PTX beyond mineral content enhancement.

The immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in participants with underlying comorbidity diseases: A prospective cohort study.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) increases mortality rates in older adults and those with comorbidities. Individuals with certain comorbidities may have a poor immune response and require early booster vaccines. We aimed to assess the immune response after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, at 84-day intervals, in participants with the following comorbidities; diabetes mellitus; obesity; cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; rheumatological disease; cirrhosis; hematological disease; hematological malignancy; or solid malignancy. The study was conducted at Chulabhorn Hospital in Thailand, with healthy healthcare workers serving as the control group. Of the 769 participants, 352 were in the healthy cohort and 417 were in the comorbidity cohort, all received at least one dose of vaccine. Anti-RBD total antibody levels were evaluated on Day 0, Day 84, and Day 112. The results at Day 112 (4 weeks after the second dose) showed that individuals with comorbidities had a poor immune response compared to healthy individuals, especially those with hematological malignancy and solid malignancy. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-RBD antibody in the comorbidity cohort was significantly lower than that in the healthy cohort: 433.66 BAU/ml (95% CI 334.62-562.01) versus 1096.14 BAU/ml (95% CI 1010.26-1189.33), respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) between the two cohorts was 0.40 (95% CI 0.30-0.52, p < .001). This study concluded that individuals with comorbidities, particularly hematological and solid malignancies, had poor immune responses and may require an early booster vaccine to prevent infection and death.

Dynamics of anti-RBD (anti-receptor binding domain) levels in diabetes patients following the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in the Thai population.

The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) was used in Thailand during the early outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A previous study showed a low immune response in diabetes patients after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine. Furthermore, humoral immune responses after the second vaccination were inconsistent. This study evaluated the immunogenicity following the first and second doses of the AZD1222 vaccine in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with the general population of Thailand. This was a prospective, single-center cohort study. 59 adults with T2D and 118 age- and sex-matched healthcare personnel were eligible. The participants received two doses of AZD1222 12 weeks apart. Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, using an automated electrochemiluminesence immunoassay (ECLIA), were measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks after the first dose of vaccine, and 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. The anti-RBD levels were reported as the geometric mean concentration (GMC) and compared between groups using the geometric mean ratio (GMR). A total of 177 participants were included: The average age of 59 T2D patients was 60.1 years (SD: 11.4), and 31 (52.5%) of them were female. The GMC of anti-RBD 8 and 12 weeks after the first vaccination were significantly lower in T2D (week 8 60; 17.05 BAU/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.1-26.19, P = 0.035, week 12; 24.68 BAU/mL, 95% CI 16.4-37.0, P = 0.002) than in those without diabetes (week 8; 29.79 BAU/mL, 95% CI 22.07-40.42, week 12; 50.67 BAU/mL, 95% CI 40.62-63.20). However, there was no difference in the GMC of anti-RBD 4 weeks after the second vaccination among groups (T2D; 687.95 BAU/mL, 95% CI 462.7-1022.7, Normal; 697.95 BAU/mL, 95% CI 583.7-834.5, P = 0.947). In both groups, the GMC of anti-RBD was persistently high without decline 12 weeks after the first vaccination. Albuminuria was a major factor related to low humoral immune responses in T2D patients after the second dose of AZD122 vaccine (the GMR was 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, P = 0.047) whereas the HbA1C level and age were not. Immunogenicity in T2D cases was lower than in the normal population after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine. The two doses of AZD122 vaccine induced immunity in T2D equal to that of normal individuals in Thailand. People with diabetes should be boosted as soon as possible to induce adequate immunity to prevent COVID-19 infection.

Immune Response to CoronaVac and Its Safety in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Compared with Healthcare Workers.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been critical for preventing disease. Previous research showed patients with diabetes have impaired immunity. This study aimed to determine the immunity to coronavirus after CoronaVac by comparing patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and healthcare workers (HCW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study evaluated immune responses and safety after two doses of CoronaVac in T2D and HCW groups at Chulabhorn Hospital. The levels of total antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at baseline and 4 weeks after vaccination were collected. The level of anti-RBD concentrations was reported as geometric mean concentration (GMC) and compared between groups using the geometric mean ratio (GMR). RESULTS: 81 participants were included; 27 had T2D and 54 were HCW. After complete vaccination, anti-RBD concentrations were not significantly different between T2D (57.68 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 29.08; 114.44) and HCW (72.49 BAU/mL, 95% CI = 55.77; 94.22) groups. Subgroup analysis showed the GMC of anti-RBD was significantly lower in T2D patients with dyslipidaemia (50.04 BAU/mL) than in T2D patients without dyslipidaemia (341.64 BAU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The immune response at 4 weeks after two doses of CoronaVac did not significantly differ between patients with T2D and HCW.

The Effect of high temperature on the stability of basal insulin in a pen: a randomized controlled, crossover, equivalence trial.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin is an essential medicine in the management of diabetes. When stored at high temperatures(HTs), its efficacy could rapidly decline. Therefore, appropriate storage of in-use insulin is necessary to achieve its maximum therapeutic effects. However, the ambient temperature in tropical countries is normally relatively high. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of basal insulin in a pen previously kept at 37°C for 21 days and basal insulin in a refrigerated pen (2°C-8°C). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was used to evaluate daily mean glucose levels (MGLs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized controlled, crossover, equivalence trial recruited adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycated hemoglobin levels <8% who had used insulin glargine for >3 months. Subjects were randomized for sequential use of refrigerated basal insulin followed by basal insulin kept at HT, with a 2-week washout between phases. The HT insulin pens were stored in a 37°C incubator for 21 days before use, while the refrigerated insulin pens were stored at 2°C-8°C. Study patients received 7-day CGM. The primary outcome was the difference in the groups' MGLs. The secondary outcome parameters were glucose variability represented by the standard deviation (SD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), and percentage of time in range (TIR). The remaining quantity of insulin was evaluated by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) assay. RESULTS: Forty patients completed the study. The MGLwas 158.7±30.5 mg/dL and 157.0±40.9 mg/dL in the HT and refrigerated insulin pen groups, respectively (p=0.72). The groups had no significant differences in MAGE7day, SD, percentage of TIR, carryover period, or treatment effects (all p>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the remaining quantity of insulin evaluated by UHPLC (p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: HT basal insulin pens retain their potency and have biological activity comparable to that of refrigerated pens.Trial registration number TCTR20210611002.

Antibody levels in people with diabetes after one dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine.

Patients with diabetes and coexistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a higher risk of COVID-19 complications. Therefore, it is critical that sustained and effective immunogenicity against COVID-19 is achieved in such patients. This study evaluates the antibody response for 56 days after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine in subjects with and without diabetes to assess the potential risk of delaying the second dose. This study included 282 people who received one dose of AZD1222. The geometric mean concentration of antibodies specific for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 IgG at 56 days was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D; 15.13 BAU/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.7-21.4) than in those without diabetes (40.20 BAU/mL, 95% CI = 33.43-48.36), as confirmed by a geometric mean ratio of 0.37 (95% CI = 0.25-0.54). Weaker immune responses were also observed in diabetic patients ≥ 65 years old (10.09 BAU/mL, 95% CI = 6.09-16.71) compared with their younger counterparts (22.31 BAU/mL, 95% CI = 13.98-35.59, P = 0.034). People with T2D had weaker antibody responses than those without diabetes after the first dose of AZD1222. Older age was associated with weaker antibody responses in elderly patients with diabetes.

Persistence of immunogenicity, contributing factors of an immune response, and reactogenicities after a single dose of the ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) COVID-19 vaccine in the Thai population.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the vaccine's short supply and the efficacy of a single dose of the ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) vaccine, many governments delayed the interval between prime and boost dose from 4 to 8-12 weeks. However, the waning of immune response in this period is a concern. This study evaluated the durability, contributing factors of anti-RBD antibody concentration, and reactogenicities after the single dose of AZD1222 vaccine in the Thai population. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study at Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Individuals 18 years or older who were negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody were eligible. Anti- receptor-binding domain antibody concentrations were tested at least three weeks after the first vaccination and immediately before the second dose of vaccine. Information on reactogenicities was obtained via a questionnaire sent by a short message service. RESULTS: Anti-RBD Antibody concentration at 2 and 3 months post-vaccination were significantly higher than at 1 months post-vaccination (20.14 BAU/mL (95%CI; 16.37, 24.77) at 1 month, 48.08 BAU/mL (95%CI; 42.76, 54.08) at 2 month, and 65.01 BAU/mL (95%CI; 58.88,71.61) at 3 month). Adverse events occurred in approximately 60% of participants. Factors influencing vaccine immunogenicity include age, sex, the time elapsed from the first dose of vaccine, and underlying disease with diabetes and hematologic disease. CONCLUSION: A single dose of AZD1222 could elicit immune responses that did not decline within three months in Thai individuals. These data support the public health strategy of a delay between the prime and boost dose of AZD1222 of 4 to 12 weeks.

Differentiating tuberculous pleuritis from other exudative lymphocytic pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the combination of clinical and pleural fluid data can be used to calculate a score which helps facilitate differential diagnosis between tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) and No-TBP effusions. However, a reliable determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) remains difficult to obtain in Thailand. Therefore, the aim of our study was set out to develop a scoring which makes use of clinical and pleural fluid data. METHODS: A retrospective study involved 15 patients with TBP and 41 patients with no-TBP. The clinical and pleural fluid data of all patients from January 1, 2011, 32 to December 31, 2014, were collected. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: The parameters were superior in detecting TBP, including the ADA ≥17.5 U/L, In scoring I [ADA ≥40 U/L, age The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.35 years, temperature ≥37.8 ℃, and RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L] as ≥1.5 points, and scoring II [no previous history of cancer, age The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.35 years, temperature ≥37.8 ℃ RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L, pleural protein ≥50 g/L, and LDH ratio ≥2.2] as ≥4.5 points, since the area under curve (AUC) 74.0%, 74.0%, and 81.0%, sensitivity 73.3%, 73.3%, and 71.4%, and specificity 68.7%, 62.5%, and 71.1%, respectively). Moreover, no previous history of cancer and lower RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L indicated sensitivity (90.6% and 65.5%), and specificity (70.0% and 44.4%), respectively. Summated scores of ≥5 points in model 1 and ≥6 points in model 2 yielded measures of sensitivity (46.7% and 57.1%), and specificity (84.4% and 80.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.